HB1309, SB302, SB308 Among CUT’s Weekly Oppositions

Bills Opposed by CUT

HB1309 – Protect Access to Gender-Affirming Health Care

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill, which codifies gender-affirming care coverage in state law. [cite: 3] [cite_start]CUT argues this is an unfunded mandate for medical procedures that will increase taxpayer costs through Medicaid and higher insurance rates for public employees. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The organization highlights this as regulatory overreach that could drive businesses and insurance companies out of Colorado. [cite: 3] [cite_start]CUT also states the Safety Clause was improperly used to “sneak” the bill by voters without proper debate. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Kyle Brown (D), Brianna Titone (D), Lisa Cutter (D), and numerous others. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 05/23/2025. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1309. [cite: 3]

SB302 – Achieving a Better Life Experience Tax Deduction

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill, which extends the ABLE state income tax deduction until 2030. [cite: 3] [cite_start]CUT’s opposition stems from concerns about potential abuse due to poorly defined terms like “disabilities” and the uncapped nature of the deduction, which could strain the state’s General Fund. [cite: 3] [cite_start]They argue that the benefits of this deduction unfairly skew towards higher-income households and that the extension commits the state to long-term revenue loss. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Cathy Kipp (D), Cleave Simpson (R), Lorena Garcia (D), and others. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 05/24/2025. [cite: 3] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-302. [cite: 3]

SB308 – Medicaid Services Related to Federal Authorizations

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill, which creates two cash funds to implement federally matched Medicaid coverage for certain services. [cite: 8] [cite_start]CUT objects to the bill’s convoluted and non-transparent process, which increases the administrative budget by over $7 million and adds 8.3 full-time employees annually. [cite: 8] [cite_start]There is also no guarantee that federal funding will continue. [cite: 8] [cite_start]CUT calls the inclusion of the Safety Clause nonsensical. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Judith Amabile (D), Barbara Kirkmeyer (R), Emily Sirota (D), Rick Taggart (R), and others. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 05/30/2025. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-308. [cite: 8]

SB311 – Inactive Cash Funds

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill, which transfers money from inactive cash funds to the General Fund. [cite: 8] [cite_start]While CUT agrees that taxpayer money should not sit idle, they argue it should be returned directly to the taxpayers rather than moved to the General Fund for unspecified purposes. [cite: 8] [cite_start]CUT expresses its growing disdain for what it considers a misuse of the Safety Clause. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Judith Amabile (D), Barbara Kirkmeyer (R), Shannon Bird (D), and others. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 06/03/2025. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-311. [cite: 8]

SB316 – Auraria Higher Education Center Appropriations

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill, which requires the Auraria Higher Education Center (AHEC) to hire a third-party contractor to oversee agreements with its constituent schools. [cite: 8] [cite_start]CUT views this as regulatory overreach and a waste of taxpayer money, arguing that if current leadership is incompetent, they should be fired rather than monitored by a costly, outside contractor. [cite: 8] [cite_start]They also question the inclusion of the Safety Clause. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Judith Amabile (D), Jeff Bridges (D), Emily Sirota (D), and others. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 06/04/2025. [cite: 8] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-316. [cite: 8]

SB319 – Modification Higher Education Expenses Income Tax Incentive

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill, which modifies an existing income tax incentive for higher education. [cite: 13] [cite_start]CUT finds the underlying program unfair because it is limited to public colleges and excludes trade or private schools. [cite: 13] [cite_start]The bill is opposed for appropriating over $135,000 and hiring two new employees for data tracking that CUT believes should already be easily accessible. [cite: 13] [cite_start]It is also noted that the Safety Clause should not have been used. [cite: 13] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Judith Amabile (D), Jeff Bridges (D), Shannon Bird (D), and others. [cite: 13] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 06/04/2025. [cite: 13] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-319. [cite: 13]

SB320 – Commercial Motor Vehicle Transportation

[cite_start]

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill because it extends sales and tax fee exemptions for certain “low emitting” heavy-duty vehicles. [cite: 13] [cite_start]CUT argues that this creates an unfair system, as these vehicles cause the same amount of road damage and should contribute equally to road repair funds. [cite: 13] [cite_start]This policy is seen as the government “picking winners and losers” and will ultimately decrease TABOR refunds for taxpayers. [cite: 13] [cite_start]CUT called the use of the Safety Clause “absurd.” [cite: 13] [cite_start]The bill is sponsored by Jeff Bridges (D), Barbara Kirkmeyer (R), Shannon Bird (D), and others. [cite: 13] [cite_start]The bill’s current status is Governor Signed on 06/03/2025. [cite: 13] [cite_start]The full text of the bill can be found at: https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-320. [cite: 13]

Click on a row in the table for the complete bill information, including commentary, bill sponsors, and links. 

Url Week Rated Bill Number Name Sponsor List CUT Position CUT Comment SC Bill Progress Last Action Action Date Versions Votes State Link Fiscal Note Link
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/187862305/05/2025HB1309Protect Access to Gender-Affirming Health CareKyle Brown (D)*, Brianna Titone (D)*, Lisa Cutter (D)*, Julie Gonzales (D)*, Jennifer Bacon (D)*, Chad Clifford (D)*, Monica Duran (D)*, Meg Froelich (D)*, Lorena García (D)*, Lindsay Gilchrist (D)*, Eliza Hamrick (D)*, Junie Joseph (D)*, Sheila Lieder (D)*, Mandy Lindsay (D)*, William Lindstedt (D)*, Javier Mabrey (D)*, Matt Martinez (D)*, Tisha Mauro (D)*, Karen McCormick (D)*, Amy Paschal (D)*, Manny Rutinel (D)*, Gretchen Rydin (D)*, Emily Sirota (D)*, Lesley Smith (D)*, Rebekah Stewart (D)*, Katie Stewart (D)*, Tammy Story (D)*, Alex Valdez (D)*, Elizabeth Velasco (D)*, Jenny Willford (D)*, Steven Woodrow (D)*, Yara Zokaie (D)*, Andrew Boesenecker (D), Sean Camacho (D), Michael Carter (D), Cecelia Espenoza (D), Meghan Lukens (D), Bob Marshall (D), Julie McCluskie (D), Judith Amabile (D), James Coleman (D), Jessie Danielson (D), Tony Exum (D), Nick Hinrichsen (D), Cathy Kipp (D), Chris Kolker (D), Janice Marchman (D), Dafna Michaelson Jenet (D), Marc Snyder (D), Tom Sullivan (D), Katie Wallace (D), Michael Weissman (D), Faith Winter (D)NOThe bill codifies gender affirming care coverage in state law and exempts testosterone prescriptions from select tracking requirements.This bill is an unfunded mandate for highly questionable medical procedures for which ALL Colorado residents will end up paying, either through taxes or higher insurance rates. Taxpayers will pay for increased Medicaid costs and for health care coverage of employees of state and local government agencies. The bill contains yet another “required coverage” line item which will drive some insurance companies out of our state thereby potentially leaving the state as the only provider of health insurance. It may drive businesses out of the state. These costs will reduce the attraction of businesses to Colorado. Gifts, grants, and donations are made permissible by this bill to get around the Hyde amendment (prohibits use of federal dollars for abortions). This will no doubt pull in more money and influence from Planned Parenthood and others. The Safety Clause was improperly included as if this bill addressed some sort of immediate threat to peace, health or safety. Attaching the Safety Clause to a bill that was introduced too late for proper debate is evidence of the legislature trying to "sneak" this by the voters.SCSigned/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed01/01/1970614https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1309https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_hb1309_f1.pdf|Fiscal Note FN3
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/188726105/05/2025SB302Achieving a Better Life Experience Tax DeductionCathy Kipp (D)*, Cleave Simpson (R)*, Lorena García (D)*, Yara Zokaie (D)*, Judith Amabile (D), Lisa Cutter (D), Julie Gonzales (D), Iman Jodeh (D), Janice Marchman (D), Katie Wallace (D), Jennifer Bacon (D), Shannon Bird (D), Andrew Boesenecker (D), Kyle Brown (D), Chad Clifford (D), Lindsay Gilchrist (D), Mandy Lindsay (D), Javier Mabrey (D), Julie McCluskie (D), Manny Rutinel (D), Emily Sirota (D), Tammy Story (D)NOCurrently, the Achieving a Better Life Experience state income tax deduction (ABLE deduction) expires on December 31, 2025. The bill extends the ABLE deduction until December 31, 2030. The bill specifies that the purposes of the ABLE deduction are to provide support to individuals with disabilities and their families and to provide an incentive for individuals with disabilities and their families to set aside money in an account to cover future disability-related expenses.The program sounds laudable. However, “disabilities” is poorly defined, and “citizens” is not defined, leaving the bill open to abuse. Quoting from an AI conclusion: "The ABLE tax deduction extension bill has notable downsides: fiscal costs, limited reach to low-income families, administrative complexities, temporary benefits, and failure to address structural ABLE program flaws like Medicaid payback or eligibility limits. While it supports a valuable program, its benefits skew toward higher-income households, and its impact on workforce participation or financial security may be modest without addressing systemic barriers. Policymakers should consider complementary measures (e.g., outreach, federal advocacy for ABLE reforms) and robust reporting to ensure the deduction maximizes support for Coloradans with disabilities."Uncapped Expenditure: Unlike some tax incentives, the deduction has no aggregate cap, meaning costs could escalate if more families claim it. This could strain Colorado’s General Fund, particularly during economic downturns or if budget surpluses decline, diverting funds from other priorities like education, healthcare, or infrastructure.Long-Term Commitment: The extension to 2031 (with reporting through 2035) commits the state to a decade of revenue loss, which may be challenging to sustain if economic conditions change or if the program’s benefits do not justify the cost.Signed/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed01/01/197065https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-302https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb0302_hse.pdf|Fiscal Note/Analysis - Budget Staff Analysis SA2
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/188803105/05/2025SB308Medicaid Services Related to Federal AuthorizationsJudith Amabile (D)*, Barbara Kirkmeyer (R)*, Emily Sirota (D)*, Rick Taggart (R)*, Jeff Bridges (D)*, Shannon Bird (D)*, Marc Catlin (R), Tony Exum (D), Iman Jodeh (D), Kyle Mullica (D), Andrew Boesenecker (D), Chad Clifford (D), Julie McCluskie (D)NOThis bill creates two cash funds to allow the Department of Health Care Policy and Financing to implement federally matched Medicaid coverage of health-related social need and reentry services, and to reinvest the state savings (unused funds) in the Department of Corrections, the Department of Local Affairs, and the Department of Human Services. This bill makes multiple cash fund transfers, including transferring unused funds to these new funds instead of returning them to the General Fund. This whole convoluted process requires 8.3 FTE and $7M+ increased administrative budget each year. Surely there is a more straightforward and transparent way to accomplish this goal. And there is no real assurance at this time that such federal funding will continue! Finally, the Safety Clause attached to this bill makes no sense.SCSigned/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed01/01/197065https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-308https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb0308_sn2.pdf|Fiscal Note/Analysis - Budget Staff Analysis SA2
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/188832405/05/2025SB311Inactive Cash FundsJudith Amabile (D)*, Barbara Kirkmeyer (R)*, Shannon Bird (D)*, Rick Taggart (R)*, Jeff Bridges (D)*, Emily Sirota (D)*, Michael Carter (D)NOThis bill requires the State Treasurer to transfer all monies in inactive Cash Funds back to the General Fund. We liked the idea that taxpayer money would no longer sit idly in an account, with no real purpose. Taxpayers work hard for their money, and do not like the idea of having it taken, only to sit in an account with no purpose. But why move it to the General Fund for some unspecified and unknown purpose? That money belongs to the taxpayers and should be returned to them, the rightful owners. And our disdain for the Safety Clause grows every time it is misused.SCSigned/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed06/03/202564https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-311https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb311_f1.pdf|Fiscal Note FN2
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/188861405/05/2025SB316Auraria Higher Education Center AppropriationsJudith Amabile (D)*, Jeff Bridges (D)*, Emily Sirota (D)*, Rick Taggart (R)*, Barbara Kirkmeyer (R)*, Shannon Bird (D)*, Lisa Cutter (D), Tony Exum (D), Iman Jodeh (D), Dafna Michaelson Jenet (D), Chad Clifford (D), Cecelia Espenoza (D), Mandy Lindsay (D), Naquetta Ricks (D), Lesley Smith (D), Alex Valdez (D), Steven Woodrow (D)NOThis bill requires AHEC , in conjunction with its three constituent schools (Metro State, CU Denver, & Community College of Denver) to hire an outside 3rd party contractor to oversee the agreement(s) between AHEC and the individual schools. The cost of this 3rd Party is not specified, and to be absorbed by the entities. What a headscratcher! If we have competent people running those organizations, an outside contractor is not needed. And if the people in charge are not competent…. fire them! And then the legislature adds in the Safety Clause?SCSigned/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed06/04/202565https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-316https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb316_f1.pdf|Fiscal Note FN2
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/188913405/05/2025SB319Modification Higher Education Expenses Income Tax IncentiveJudith Amabile (D)*, Jeff Bridges (D)*, Shannon Bird (D)*, Rick Taggart (R)*, Barbara Kirkmeyer (R)*, Emily Sirota (D)*, Lisa Cutter (D), Tony Exum (D), Iman Jodeh (D), Cathy Kipp (D), Dafna Michaelson Jenet (D), Andrew Boesenecker (D), Michael Carter (D), Chad Clifford (D), Eliza Hamrick (D), Julie McCluskie (D), Jacqueline Phillips (D), Naquetta Ricks (D), Lesley Smith (D), Steven Woodrow (D)NOThe state allows a student pursuing higher education who satisfies statutorily specified eligibility criteria to claim an income tax incentive for amounts paid for tuition and fees for qualifying academic semesters or terms that the student completes. The bill clarifies the statute that provides for the income tax incentives to improve the administration, including data tracking and reporting, of the incentive. For the 2025-26 state fiscal year, $135,446 is appropriated to the department of revenue for use by the taxation business group to implement the bill.This bill modifies an existing program that CUT sees as problematic. The tax credit is only allowed for public schools, and only for college students, but not allowed for trade school or private school tuition. Why is the tax credit dependent on the student requesting Federal aid? This program looks like a universal scholarship based solely on family income.The bill itself is also problematic. The bill is intended to increase use of the credit but fails to address the loss of tax revenue. CUT observes that tax information is entirely computerized. The data the bill seeks to have reported is already known. Taxpayers should not have to pay the Department of Revenue an additional $135K and hire two additional employees to calculate the cost of this incentive. This should be a "gimme". This bill does not address an immediate peace, health or safety issue. The Safety Clause should not be used.SCSigned/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed06/04/202564https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-319https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb0319_hse.pdf|Fiscal Note/Analysis - Budget Staff Analysis SA2
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/188915805/05/2025SB320Commercial Motor Vehicle TransportationJeff Bridges (D)*, Barbara Kirkmeyer (R)*, Shannon Bird (D)*, Rick Taggart (R)*, Judith Amabile (D)*, Emily Sirota (D)*, Nick Hinrichsen (D)NOThis bill is extending sales and tax fee exemption for “certain” heavy duty motor vehicles that are “low emitting." Low emitting vehicles however cause just as much damage to roads as other vehicles and therefore should not be exempted from paying fees that repair our roads. Could this bill shift the burden of road repair to gas vehicles and exempt electric vehicles? This bill is a prime example of the government picking winners and losers and will decrease TABOR refunds. An absurd use of the Safety Clause.SCSigned/Enacted/AdoptedGovernor Signed06/03/202567https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-320https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb320_f1.pdf|Fiscal Note FN3
** Data provided by www.BillTrack50.com **
UrlWeek RatedBill NumberNameSponsor ListCUT PositionCUT CommentSCBill ProgressLast ActionAction DateVersionsVotesState LinkFiscal Note Link

Sign up for CUT's legislative emails

Support the Colorado Union of Taxpayers by subscribing to our legislative emails for just $25 annually. Stay informed about tax policies and advocacy efforts while helping us fight for your right to keep more of your hard-earned money. Support us today and make a difference!

Donate to the CUT Foundation

Support the Colorado Union of Taxpayers Foundation, a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization, by making a donation today. Your contribution helps us educate Coloradans on the fiscal impact of legislation and ballot issues, ensuring transparency, and accountability in government spending.

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) details its opposition to bills from the 2025 special session, citing TABOR violations and fiscal irresponsibility. See CUT's position on key tax and spending legislation affecting Colorado taxpayers.
Arguments against Denver and Lakewood tax measures: sales tax hikes, RTD revenue cap removal, and TABOR refund changes. Impacts on cost of living and local businesses
CUT opposes all 2024 ballot issues, urging voters to reject measures undermining taxpayer rights and efficient governance.
The Colorado Union of Taxpayers announces the 2024 Legislative Taxpayer Protectors, recognizing elected officials committed to safeguarding Colorado's taxpayers.
Kim Monson defends taxpayers, opposing unsustainable tax hikes burdening hard-working Coloradans.