COHB1019 – Third-Party Administration of Division of Housing Programs
The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill due to its inappropriate use of the safety clause, which declares the measure an emergency without justification. CUT highlights that the bill permits state agencies to outsource administrative functions to contractors without additional funding. This reduces available program funds and sets the stage for future cost increases, effectively burdening taxpayers with inefficiencies. The bill, supported by Representatives Emily Sirota and Nick Hinrichsen, is currently awaiting a second reading on the House floor.
COHB1026 – Repeal Copayment for Department of Corrections Inmate Health Care
CUT stands against this bill, citing the improper use of the safety clause and the unfair treatment it establishes. The organization argues that removing copays for inmates creates privileges not afforded to law-abiding citizens, with taxpayers shouldering the cost. Sponsored by Representatives Michael Carter and Lorena García, the bill recently advanced to the House Appropriations Committee.
COHB1029 – Municipal Authority Over Certain Land
This bill raises red flags for CUT as it would allow municipalities to acquire land outside their boundaries and exercise full police power over it, even if the land falls within another jurisdiction. CUT views this as a potential land grab and opposes the bill’s use of the safety clause. The measure, sponsored by Andy Boesenecker, Cathy Kipp, and Yara Zokaie, is scheduled for a second reading on the House floor.
COHB1054 – Repeal Legislative Audit Committee Reviews of Emissions Program
CUT opposes this bill for its lack of transparency and potential regulatory overreach. The repeal of audit committee reviews could lead to programs that fail to comply with federal EPA requirements, introducing unnecessary burdens on businesses and individuals reliant on combustible engines. The measure, championed by multiple bipartisan sponsors, awaits a second reading in the House.
COHB1077 – Backflow Prevention Devices Requirements
Although CUT supports reducing regulatory burdens, it opposes this bill due to its reliance on the safety clause. CUT argues that invoking the clause is unnecessary and undermines legislative transparency, even for a bill that might otherwise benefit citizens. Sponsored by Representatives Sheila Lieder, Naquetta Ricks, and Dylan Roberts, the bill is currently in committee.
COSB005 – Worker Protection Collective Bargaining
CUT strongly opposes this bill, describing it as a payoff to unions rather than a measure benefiting workers. The organization criticizes its exclusion of worker voices and its use of the safety clause to push union-driven policies. Sponsored by a large coalition of Democratic lawmakers, the bill recently passed through the Senate Business, Labor, & Technology Committee and awaits further consideration.
