CUT Opposes HB1214, SB148, and SB196

HB1214-Appropriate Use of Prison Beds

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill. This bill requires a court determination that incarceration is the most appropriate course of action for class 5 and 6 felonies, changes parole considerations for low-risk offenders, and amends statute around drug programming for parolees. This bill establishes a PRESUMPTION of parole for class 5 & 6 felons which means these criminals are let out on the street. This trades the SAFETY of Coloradans for lowering the number of prison beds. While prison beds are reduced, total FTEs go up by 15 and the number of hearings and additional findings required increases. Colorado needs to be tougher on crime-not more lenient.

Sponsors: Chad Clifford (D)”, Julie Gonzales (D)”

Bill Status: In Committee

Read the full bill text

SB148-Modifications to Campaign Finance Requirements

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill. The bill increases the prohibition on lobbyist campaign contributions from during the legislative session to year-round. This is an unnecessary restriction on free speech.

Sponsors: Michael Weissman (D)*

Bill Status: In Committee

Read the full bill text

SB196-Insurance Coverage Preventive Health-Care Services

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers (CUT) opposes this bill. CUT members unanimously oppose this bill. The bill allows the Department of Regulatory Agencies to mandate insurance coverage of certain preventative health care services in the event that federal organizations are repealed or modified. First, the bill is predicated on a hypothetical condition, that the federal mandate for insurance to provide certain types of coverage is dropped. There is no assurance that this will occur. And if it does, this bill would leave Colorado in a position of having unique insurance mandates. This could drive out insurers and raise our costs and potentially force us into single (government) coverage. Second, CUT members are opposed to health insurance coverage mandates. It is not the proper role of government to impose requirements into private contracts. People should be able to buy a “bare bones” policy without unnecessary items for them. Third, it allows the (unelected) commissioner of insurance to determine requirements if the hypothetical condition occurs. These requirements would come from the Nurse-Physician Advisory Task Force for Colorado Health Care (also unelected). Determining law should be the exclusive duty of the legislature. Last, through use of the Safety Clause, this bill makes the absurd claim that there is an immediate threat to “peace, health or safety”. This bill is only addressing some imaginary, future condition.

Sponsors: Iman Jodeh (D)*

Bill Status: In Committee

Read the full bill text

Click on a row in the table for the complete bill information, including commentary, bill sponsors, and links. 

Url Week Rated Bill Number Description CUT Position CUT Comment SC Bill Progress Last Action Action Date Sponsor List Versions Votes State Link Fiscal Note Link Name
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/182848701/01/1970HB1214Clifford & Gonzales: Appropriate Use of Prison BedsNOThis bill requires a court determination that incarceration is the most appropriate course of action for class 5 and 6 felonies, changes parole considerations for low-risk offenders, and amends statute around drug programming for parolees. This bill establishes a PRESUMPTION of parole for class 5 & 6 felons which means these criminals are let out on the street. This trades the SAFETY of Coloradans for lowering the number of prison beds. While prison beds are reduced, total FTEs go up by 15 and the number of hearings and additional findings required increases. Colorado needs to be tougher on crime – not more lenient.In CommitteeHouse Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to Finance01/01/1970Chad Clifford (D)*, Julie Gonzales (D)*11https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb25-1214https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_hb1214_l_001.pdf|Fiscal Note MEMO1Appropriate Use of Prison Beds
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/182101301/01/1970SB148Weissman: Modifications to Campaign Finance RequirementsNOThe bill increases the prohibition on lobbyist campaign contributions from during the legislative session to year-around. The bill also increases disclosure requirements.The Fiscal Note states that costs to the Department of State (DOS) will increase due to additional complaints that will result from this bill. DOS is primarily funded through business filing fees and is authorized to increase fees to cover its costs. Fees will therefore need to be raised to cover the increased costs of this bill. The increased fees will be paid by business owners who have nothing to do with campaign contributions. CUT members note that candidates need to be answerable for the contributions which they accept. They already have the prerogative to refuse or return donations.DeadSenate Committee on State, Veterans, & Military Affairs Postpone Indefinitely01/01/1970Michael Weissman (D)*11https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-148https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb148_00.pdf|Fiscal Note FN1Modifications to Campaign Finance Requirements
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/185501101/01/1970SB196Jodeh: Insurance Coverage Preventive Health-Care ServicesNOCUT members unanimously oppose this bill.The bill allows the Department of Regulatory Agencies to mandate insurance coverage of certain preventative health care services in the event that federal organizations are repealed or modified. First, the bill is predicated on a hypothetical condition, that the federal mandate for insurance to provide certain types of coverage is dropped. There is no assurance that this will occur. And if it does, this bill would leave Colorado in a position of having unique insurance mandates. This could drive out insurers and raise our costs and potentially force us into single (government) coverage. Second, CUT members are opposed to health insurance coverage mandates. It is not the proper role of government to impose requirements into private contracts. People should be able to buy a “bare bones” policy without unnecessary items for them. Third, it allows the (unelected) commissioner of insurance to determine requirements if the hypothetical condition occurs. These requirements would come from the Nurse-Physician Advisory Task Force for Colorado Health Care (also unelected). Determining law should be the exclusive duty of the legislature. Last, through use of the Safety Clause, this bill makes the absurd claim that there is an immediate threat to "peace, health or safety”. This bill is only addressing some imaginary, future condition.SCIn CommitteeSenate Second Reading Calendar (13:30:00 4/1/2025 Senate Floor)04/01/2025Iman Jodeh (D)*11https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb25-196https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025A/bills/fn/2025a_sb196_00.pdf|Fiscal Note FN1Insurance Coverage Preventive Health-Care Services
** Data provided by www.BillTrack50.com **
UrlWeek RatedBill NumberDescriptionCUT PositionCUT CommentSCBill ProgressLast ActionAction DateSponsor ListVersionsVotesState LinkFiscal Note LinkName

Sign up for CUT's legislative emails

Support the Colorado Union of Taxpayers by subscribing to our legislative emails for just $25 annually. Stay informed about tax policies and advocacy efforts while helping us fight for your right to keep more of your hard-earned money. Support us today and make a difference!

Donate to the CUT Foundation

Support the Colorado Union of Taxpayers Foundation, a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization, by making a donation today. Your contribution helps us educate Coloradans on the fiscal impact of legislation and ballot issues, ensuring transparency, and accountability in government spending.

Arguments against Denver and Lakewood tax measures: sales tax hikes, RTD revenue cap removal, and TABOR refund changes. Impacts on cost of living and local businesses
CUT opposes all 2024 ballot issues, urging voters to reject measures undermining taxpayer rights and efficient governance.
The Colorado Union of Taxpayers announces the 2024 Legislative Taxpayer Protectors, recognizing elected officials committed to safeguarding Colorado's taxpayers.
Kim Monson defends taxpayers, opposing unsustainable tax hikes burdening hard-working Coloradans.