The bill allows a municipally owned utility that cannot meet its previously filed clean energy plan’s emission reduction goals to submit a revised plan by December 31, 2026 to achieve an 80 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, compared to 2005 levels, between December 31, 2029, and December 31, 2032. The CUT Board was split on this bill with the majority voting NO. While this bill gives municipally owned utilities a slightly more realistic timeline, why was this relief proposed only for government owned utilities and not for ALL utilities? And why wasn’t the overall unfunded mandate questioned? Finally, the Safety Clause is totally inappropriate.
